Beg your pardon...
I was asking, because I´ve a 1,4 50mm, MC, 39mm long, Zuiko and wanted
to know if it has already reached the climax of optical evolution, or is
the 40mm long, non MC marked (but still MC), Zuiko (now extinct),
another optical sumit (Mount Olympus) to reach?
Speak: Is the last version and the second version identical in there
optical properties?
John Hermanson wrote:
>
> Uh oh, here we go again...
Sorry, I hope I´ve not to pay your pills against the pain ;-)
> Olympus made enough changes during production of the 1.8 to have
> 5 different parts lists, though some changes were as simple
> as Type 3 (sayting MC on the name ring,
I wouldn´t count here changes in coating as design changes, like
changing the tyre type on a car.
> front element part of filter ring assy,
With plastic aperture ring? did they change to 5/4 design?
> to Type 4 with same front element w/ filter ring but NO MC on the
> name ring (still multicoated though).
Paul D. Farrar wrote of 6/5 and 6/4 design version of the 1,8, did they
exist?
Richard
############################################################
| This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
| To receive the Digest version send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| with "subscribe olympus-digest" in the message body.
| To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
| listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe olympus" in the body.
| For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| htttp://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html
############################################################
|