>On Mar, 10 feb 1998 16:27, cosmos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
><mailto:cosmos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>Does anyone have any info (good or bad) on the Sigma-Z 300mm
>>f5.6? I might have access to one and I was wondering about
>>its quality. Thanks to all.
>>
>>)))) Daniel Biron
>>
>
>I have been using the APO (Nikon) version these days and I find it
>wonderful, very easy to focus and the photos look good.
>
>Marco
>
Hi Marco! A few points (open to anyone, of course):
1) How would I know if it is a Sigma APO lens, because it is nowhere
written as such?
2) I may be mistaken but I thought it was the Sigma 300mm f4.0 or the
400mm f5.6 which were APO, not the 300mm f5.6. Comments, anyone?
3) The Sigma-Z 300mm f5.6 I saw has an Olympus OM bayonet. Should I
pass this one up and save for the Zuiko 300mm f4.5? Since the Zuiko
would be three times more expensive, is it three times better?
4) Am I to understand that Nikon is selling rebadged Sigma lenses?
Thanks to all.
)))) Daniel Biron
############################################################
| This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
| To receive the Digest version send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| with "subscribe olympus-digest" in the message body.
| To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
| listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe olympus" in the body.
| For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| htttp://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html
############################################################
|