>Re John Gardner's email on his macro setup.
>
etc. like Gary.)
>
>The advantages of a 90mm can be obvious, I know a guy bitten by a
>venomous snake in Western Australia while attempting to photograph it
>with a zuiko 3.5 (the lens of course is indestructible!).
>
The 135mm f/4.5 Zuiko gives even better working distance as does a 200-300mm
with acromatic close up lens. However, a 200mm macro would be better.
>Hope this is of some help George! Macro photography is totally addictive
>(imagine the delight of guiding your friends and family through a slide
>show of 65 local grasshopper species - mine flee in panic!!)
>
I am very addicted. Macroholics Anonymous?
>Cheers all
>Robert Ashdown
>Australia (still attempting to gather cash for an OM4!!)
DO NOT GET RID OF THE OM-2N. It works MUCH better for what you are doing.
The OM-2N has much more range using TTL flash. John Hermanson posted such,
and I confirmed it with mine. As a result, I sold my OM-4.
Doug
##################################################################
# This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
# To receive the Olympus Digest send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# with subscribe olympus-digest in the message body.
#
# To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
# listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe olympus in the message body.
#
# For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
##################################################################
|