Frank Wrote:
>Private communication with Wim made clear what the precise purpose of
>taping the flash contact is. It does NOT shorten the minimum sync time
>in any way - that always remains a (poor) 1/60th.
>But it does bring back the possibility of the old OM-2 to allow for
>exposure times LONGER than 1/60th, measuring the ambient and flash
>light together when in auto-mode.
>
>According to Wim, the old OM-2 didn't take the flashlight into account
>well enough. The OM-4(T) might overdo a bit on this point, emphasizing
>the flash light a little too much in its calculations of the total
>light needed.
Isn't nice if Olympus provide the source codes of the controling
software in the OM-2,4,4T(i) cameras? Any one got it?
Xinjun
_ _ ____ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ __ ____ _ _ _ _
Xinjun J. Hou (hou@xxxxxxxxxxx) Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- -- -- - - -- --- -- - - --- - - -- --- - - -- ---- --- - -
##################################################################
# This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
# To receive the Olympus Digest send mail to: listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# with subscribe olympus-digest in the message body.
#
# To unsubscribe from the current list send a message to
# listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe olympus in the message body.
#
# For questions email: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
##################################################################
|